THE
DEFINITION OF genocide was coined in 1944 by a Jewish lawyer, Raphael Lemkin,
who promoted the establishment of the United Nations Convention on the Prevention
and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1948, in the aftermath of the
Holocaust committed by the Nazis against the Jewish people during the Second
World War. Often seen as the "crime of crimes", genocide is defined
by the special intent to "destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic,
racial or religious group".
Nonetheless,
as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) itself has previously made clear,
the use of force, even on a significant scale "cannot in itself constitute
an act of genocide". The proliferating misuse of claims of genocide is
worrying and threatens to denude the term of its special status. If every war
is a genocide, the term be- comes meaningless. It will also harm the Genocide
Convention should states with draw from it, to avoid its weaponization against
them,
On
October 7, 2023, Hamas and other terrorist groups initiated a war against
Israel and perpetrated unprecedented savagery, including the murder, torture,
rape and mutilation of over 1,200 Israelis, and the taking hostage of 240
people, including infants, the elderly and the sick. Hamas's atrocities are in
total violation of international humanitarian law, as is its brutal treatment
of the hostages who are still being tortured.
In
accordance with its right and obligation to de- fend itself and its citizens,
Israel had to respond forcefully, seeking to secure the re- lease of its
infants, children, women, and men being held as hostages in Gaza, and to deny
Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza the capacity to continue attacking its
citizens and territory as they have explicitly vowed to do "again and
again and again".
Israel
can hardly be blamed for using military force available to it to legitimately
defend its citizens from further attacks in accordance with the laws of war.
Israel has been consistent in defining that the IDF is targeting terror
operatives and military infrastructure and not Palestinian civilians.
The
intense fighting and scope of the civilian damage in Gaza is in large part the
outcome of Hamas' strategy to embed its combatants within the civilian
population of Gaza, including in mosques, hospitals, schools, and UN
facilities, which constitute obvious war crimes. Hamas uses civilians as human
shields and strives for a high casualty count to galvanize public opinion
against Israel.
Hamas
had prepared to fight in a dense urban landscape for over a decade; in particular
by using an unparalleled tunnel net- work deployed beneath civilian areas in
which Israeli forces are compelled to fight an asymmetric war.
On
December 29, 2023, South Africa filed an application with the International
Court of Justice instituting proceedings against Israel, alleging that Israel
is committing genocide. The misuse of the Genocide Convention against Israel is
outrageous.
South
Africa bases its case on two claims, neither of which stands up to scrutiny.
The first is the scale of civilian death and destruction in Gaza. There is no
doubt that the war in Gaza has been devastating for the civilian population.
However, this does not indicate that genocide has taken place.
The
second are various statements by Israeli officials or former officials, which
they claim prove the necessary special intent of committing genocide. The
various quotes used to suggest Israel has the intention of committing genocide
are not convincing. They do not reflect Israel's actions in prac- tice, and
many were said in the emotional aftermath of the mass slaughter and horrific
atrocities committed on October 7, an event that would shake any civilised
country to the core. It would have been better had they not been said, but they
are a far cry from any reasonable proof of intent. Moreover, they are a very
selective col- lection of cherry-picked statements, ignoring numer- ous
statements by Israel's top political and military leaders clarifying its actual
and official policies of minimising harm to civilians and ensuring humanitarian
aid.
However,
the true evidence of any lack of intent to commit genocide is Israel's
unwavering and continuous efforts to facilitate humanitarian aid (over 7,200
trucks since the be- ginning of the war) and the robust measures to minimise
civilian casualties, including warnings of attacks and precautionary measures
which often in- creased the risk to its own forces.
Indeed,
the US's National Security Council spokesperson stated that Israel "has
published online maps of places where people can go or not to go. That's
basically telegraphing your punches, and there's very few modern militaries in
the world that would do that. I don't know that we would do that." This is
hardly genocidal intent.
With
the Holocaust, where 6 million Jews were exterminated solely based on their
religion, set as a backdrop and Israel's attachment to the values of
sanctifying life, the accusation of genocide is especially painful. It is a
modern case of the ancient racist habit of blaming the Jews for the very crimes
committed against them.
The writer is
Israel's ambassador to India