It is regrettable that the report fails to recognize the profound difference between Israel’s moral behavior during Operation Protective Edge and the terror organizations it confronted. This report was commissioned by a notoriously biased institution, given an obviously biased mandate.
(Communicated by the MFA Spokesperson)
Israel is studying the
Commission of Inquiry
Report (COI) from the United Nations’ Human Rights Council (UNHRC).
However, some initial comments can be made about the COI process in
general:
1) It is well known that the entire process that led
to the production of this report was politically motivated and morally
flawed from the outset. Just as Israel seriously considered every
complaint, no matter its origin, it will also seriously study this
report. We take note of the fact that the authors of this report
admitted that they lacked much of the relevant information.
It is
regrettable that the report fails to recognize the profound difference
between Israel’s moral behavior during Operation Protective Edge and the
terror organizations it confronted.
2)
This
report was commissioned by a notoriously biased institution, given an
obviously biased mandate, and initially headed by a grossly biased
chairperson, William Schabas. The UNHRC has a singular obsession
with Israel, passing more country specific resolutions against Israel
than against Syria, Iran and North Korea combined - in fact, more than
against all other countries combined. The commission of inquiry's
mandate presumed Israel guilty from the start and its original chairman,
William Schabas, was compelled to resign due to a blatant conflict of interest (paid work for the Palestinians), which he concealed from the United Nations.
3)
The COI also lacked the necessary tools and expertise to conduct a
professional and serious examination of armed conflict situations.
Israel
will consider the report in light of these essential failings. It would
encourage all fair-minded observers to do the same.
4)
Israel is a democracy committed to the rule of law, forced to defend
itself against Palestinian terrorists who commit a double war crime:
They indiscriminately target Israeli civilians while deliberately
endangering Palestinian civilians, including children, by using them as
human shields.
5) In defending itself against attacks,
Israel's military acted according to the highest international
standards. This was confirmed by a comprehensive examination by Israeli
military and legal experts, as well as reports produced by
internationally renowned military professionals.
6) Israel
will continue to uphold its commitment to the law of armed conflict
despite the brutal tactics of its enemies. Israel will continue to
investigate alleged wrongdoing in accordance with international
standards and to cooperate with those UN bodies that conduct themselves
in an objective, fair and professional manner.
See: The 2014 Gaza Conflict: Factual and Legal Aspects - THE FULL REPORT